I attended one of the most "rigorous" interviews in my life.
Bloomberg.
That being said, it doesn't mean its interview is worst, lengthy, torturing or something worse. It is just something that I am exposed first time in my life.
As a physics graduate, living in academia, talking nonsense (which may include Physics itself) with fellows, speak to the profs as if they were your old grandpa/granny staying in neighborhood are the norm lifestyle for me. It is disturbing...when you find out that there are worlds outside which require your nimble tongue, quick action and ability to work as a team. Yes, the last item is the most lacking part in my university education in my opinion.
Well back to the topic, I got two interviews this week, one from HSA (Health Science Authority) and one from Bloomberg. The HSA one is mostly "Meh", as I found out it is not as interesting as I have imagined. My naive thought is that: "Medical Device? Physics degree is spotted in the requirement? Wow!"
It is not true.
Back to Bloomberg, I was literally stunned when attending the recruitment event. "2011 Financial Product Sales & Analytics Program", sounds awesome, doesn't it? 21 candidates were there. Wow. Apart from one life science and physics (that's me!) graduates, all of them are business/economics/finance/financial mathematics graduate, among which has people working in Google, Stockholm etc...Big pressure, even bigger when I am in Physics Department.
There are three sessions, the first is the host introduces Bloomberg and the job itself, such as career paths and responsibilities. Standard stuff. The second is self-introduction. I made some mistakes here by not showing my background and multilingual abilities, showing my weakness (not familiar with financial product) etc.
The most notable one is the third part where we are divided into three groups where we are given a scenario to solve as a team. It is a great chance and opportunity for the team leaders to observe how everyone performs and how they tackle the problem. For instance there is leader, adviser, analyst and so and so forth. I think I mentioned one quite important point, saying the cultural background of the particular client. Well at least I spoke. ;)
Conclusion? Quite an eye-opener :)